Texas Legislature Ends Session with Historic, but Imperfect, Pretrial Progress - The Bail Project Skip to main content

Donate to reunite a family today.

A family like Sandra’s. Read her story below.

test

Donate to bring someone home today.

Someone like Robert. Read his story below.

test

Donate to pay someone’s bail today.

Someone like Michael. Read his story below.

test

Donate to pay someone’s bail today.

Someone like Ashley. Read her story below.

test

Donate to bring someone home today.

Someone like Sherry. Read her story below.

test

Press Contact: Devin McMahon, Manager of Communications

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 

AUSTIN, TXAs the Texas Legislature adjourns its 2025 session, The Bail Project recognizes a pivotal – yet mixed – moment for pretrial justice. Lawmakers passed an improved version of Senate Joint Resolution 5 (SJR 5), a proposed constitutional amendment that expands the state’s pretrial detention authority but includes historic due process safeguards. At the same time, the House rejected Senate Joint Resolution 1 (SJR 1) and Senate Joint Resolution 87 (SJR 87), two of this session’s most dangerous bail-related proposals. However, the passage of Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) marks a troubling expansion of wealth-based detention practices. 

Nicole Zayas Manzano, Deputy Director of Policy at The Bail Project, issued the following statement:

“The Texas legislature stepped back from the brink by passing an improved version of SJR 5 with critical due process safeguards, while rejecting two of the most dangerous pretrial proposals – SJR 1 and SJR 87. The original Senate version of SJR 5 would have gutted legal protections and unleashed a wave of unchecked pretrial incarceration. Instead, the House adopted a version that guarantees the right to counsel and requires judges to consider alternatives before jailing legally innocent people. While not without flaws, SJR 5 marks real progress toward a fairer system. 

At the same time, the passage of SB 9 casts a shadow on this progress. By expanding mandatory money bail and limiting judicial discretion, SB 9 further entrenches a two-tiered justice system that punishes poverty. We condemn this setback and caution against the continued misuse of pretrial incarceration.

These outcomes were made possible by years of grassroots organizing, legal advocacy, and steadfast resistance to regressive bail proposals. We are deeply grateful to our partners and allies who helped defend civil rights and move Texas closer to pretrial justice.”

About the Legislation

  • Senate Joint Resolution 5 (SJR 5) – Awaiting Voter Approval, Will be on November Ballot
    This proposed constitutional amendment expands the state’s authority to detain legally innocent Texans pretrial, but includes key due process protections: the right to counsel at bail hearings, a “clear and convincing evidence” standard for detention, a requirement that judges consider reasonable conditions of release, and a distinction between “willful nonappearance” and unintentional missed court dates. However, it also mandates detention in some cases and weakens standards for assessing flight risk. SJR 5 now moves to the ballot for voter approval.
  • Senate Bill 9 (SB 9) – Awaiting Governor’s Approval
    SB 9 significantly expands wealth-based detention by requiring cash bail for more offenses, limiting judicial discretion, and allowing prosecutors to appeal bail decisions, delaying release for up to 20 days. It also curtails the authority of magistrates and hearing officers, increasing delays and incarceration. The Bail Project strongly opposes this bill.
  • Senate Joint Resolution 1 (SJR 1) – Failed To Pass
    This proposed amendment would have allowed blanket denial of bail to non-citizens charged with certain offenses – a discriminatory and unconstitutional measure. The legislature rightly rejected it.
  • Senate Joint Resolution 87 (SJR 87) – Failed To Pass
    This proposal would have allowed automatic denial of bail based solely on prior convictions or release on bail, disregarding flight risk and public safety. It relied on a dangerously low evidentiary standard and was defeated by the legislature.
  • Senate Bill 40 (SB 40) – Awaiting Governor’s Approval
    SB 40 prohibits local governments from contracting with nonprofits that use donations to pay bail, a thinly veiled attack on The Bail Project based on misinformation. A review by the Harris County Auditor’s Office debunked claims used to justify the bill’s introduction.

The Bail Project is available for comment on the full slate of bail-related legislation from this session.

Thank you for your valuable attention. The urgency and complication of the cash bail crisis requires meaningful participation to create real change – change that is only achieved through the support of readers like youPlease consider sharing this piece with your networks and donating what you can today to sustain our vital work.

Manager of Communications at The Bail Project, Devin McMahon
Manager of Communications

Devin McMahon

As the Manager of Communications, Ms. McMahon leverages her extensive background in advocacy communications to advance The Bail Project's mission of eliminating cash bail. Ms. McMahon brings specialized expertise in message development, media relations, and strategic communications. Before joining The Bail Project, Ms. McMahon orchestrated and supported high-impact advocacy campaigns at RALLY, an advocacy and communications firm, where she developed breakthrough communication strategies for influential organizations including Arnold Ventures, March for Our Lives, National Network of Abortion Funds, and the California Department of Public Health. She received her B.A. in Politics from Oberlin College.